Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Androstenetrione, NCAA banned?
Bob95633
  Posted: Dec 6 2005, 07:58 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 95633
Joined: 6-December 05




Androstenetrione (6-oxo)
Hey, im wondering if this substence is "related" to Androstenediol, or androstenedione becuase though this exact chemical isnt listed as banned but the NCAA rules put "and other related compounds" as any substence that are included in the class by thier pharmacological action and/or chemical structure. So im just wonder if anyone understands that kinda jargon and can tell me if its legal to take or not by NCAA standards. Thanks alot for anyones help.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Succio
Posted: Dec 6 2005, 08:28 PM
Quote Post


Guru
16 Percent of Max Posts16 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 4786
Member No.: 80312
Joined: 11-July 05



im pretty sure they are related.


--------------------
user posted image
PMEmail Poster
Top
rich_55
Posted: Dec 7 2005, 09:42 AM
Quote Post


Enjoying Life and Growing!
12 Percent of Max Posts12 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3633
Member No.: 15387
Joined: 18-January 04



That product is banned by most organizations. Most estrogen inhibitors are banned by athletic organizations and if not they will be soon.


--------------------
user posted image

**CONTROLLED LABS SPONSORED ATHLETE**
**MAX MUSCLE SPONSORED ATHLETE**
NATURAL PRO BODYBUILDER & TRAINER

Check out RichBodyFit.com
INBF NATURAL BUCKEYE CLASSIC coming next May to Columbus!
PMEmail Poster
Top
michael74932
Posted: Dec 9 2005, 12:23 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Members
Posts: 46
Member No.: 74932
Joined: 22-May 05



I personally think that people with high testosterone counts should be banned....dang a-holes walking around the field with 2x the natural test of others....seriously, they say that the field of "competition" should be "fair", but some players have great natural advantages compared to others. maybe natual levels of test, and all other hormones, should be monitored.....

Anyways, yes they are related.....but Androdiol and dione were Prohormones(steroidal)....the trione is intended, like the others said, as an anti-estrogen(in-effect, aid in rising natural test).....if you are positive trione is not on the list, then you might be ok....but at the rate they are going, bet it will be, along with naturals, like creatine....wonder when vitamins and minerals will be banned....
PMEmail Poster
Top
lclock
Posted: Dec 9 2005, 04:24 PM
Quote Post


Member
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 95612
Joined: 6-December 05



QUOTE (michael74932 @ Dec 9 2005, 12:23 PM)
I personally think that people with high testosterone counts should be banned....dang a-holes walking around the field with 2x the natural test of others....seriously, they say that the field of "competition" should be "fair", but some players have great natural advantages compared to others. maybe natual levels of test, and all other hormones, should be monitored.....

Anyways, yes they are related.....but Androdiol and dione were Prohormones(steroidal)....the trione is intended, like the others said, as an anti-estrogen(in-effect, aid in rising natural test).....if you are positive trione is not on the list, then you might be ok....but at the rate they are going, bet it will be, along with naturals, like creatine....wonder when vitamins and minerals will be banned....

I disagree.
PMEmail Poster
Top
michael74932
Posted: Dec 10 2005, 08:46 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Members
Posts: 46
Member No.: 74932
Joined: 22-May 05



Thanks for you two cents worth of oposition, but do you care to make an attempt to actually illiterate on your "disagreement"? If you are refering to my half-witted remark towards the NCAA, maybe you would care to explain youself, instead of blotting down a generic phrase as if you are a twelve-year-old with a mutant form of tourette's syndrome.
If you are refering to the first section of my responce, it was again a witty remark which did not pertain to the person's question. If you are refering to my actual valued reply to the persons question; it was not meant to be pharmacologically correct, just enought to make a possible spark in his prusuit of understading in the subject.
If you wish to explain you stance, and possibly bring some enlightening material, that would be great, since a cheap responce like that is rather annoying. wink.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
lclock
Posted: Dec 10 2005, 11:06 PM
Quote Post


Member
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 95612
Joined: 6-December 05



QUOTE (michael74932 @ Dec 10 2005, 08:46 PM)
Thanks for you two cents worth of oposition, but do you care to make an attempt to actually illiterate on your "disagreement"? If you are refering to my half-witted remark towards the NCAA, maybe you would care to explain youself, instead of blotting down a generic phrase as if you are a twelve-year-old with a mutant form of tourette's syndrome.
If you are refering to the first section of my responce, it was again a witty remark which did not pertain to the person's question. If you are refering to my actual valued reply to the persons question; it was not meant to be pharmacologically correct, just enought to make a possible spark in his prusuit of understading in the subject.
If you wish to explain you stance, and possibly bring some enlightening material, that would be great, since a cheap responce like that is rather annoying. wink.gif

Your post doesn't warrant a reply further then this.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Chad74723
Posted: Dec 11 2005, 09:16 PM
Quote Post


POWER is my game!!! ) :<
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 169
Member No.: 74723
Joined: 19-May 05



i heard this banned ingrediant is "hidden" in Axis-ht.... in that StAr ingrediant whatever the heck that is...

and doesn't that cause cancer or something?

bad new bears is all i have to say about that


--------------------
Raw Bench: 400
Weight: 185
PMEmail PosterMSN
Top
termite
Posted: Feb 20 2006, 06:28 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 103725
Joined: 20-February 06



I am completely new to the bodybuilding arena and ask questions anywhere I can get educated answers. I am a 33 yr old female weighing 105 lbs at 5'3". I'm tired of being scrawny. I work out religiously and painfully and since I have no body fat hope to see muscle gains soon. Should I consider taking androstenetrione? What can I do to build bulk instead of stringy muscle fibers? I eat 7 meals per day and supplement with weight gainer. I don't want ot look like a man, just a strong muscular female. Anybody got any words of wisdom?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Bryan60275
Posted: Feb 20 2006, 07:54 PM
Quote Post


re-he-he-heally?
15 Percent of Max Posts15 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 4559
Member No.: 60275
Joined: 19-January 05



women and anti-estrogens sounds like a recipe for disaster if you ask me. i strongly think androstenetrione is NCAA banned. It's banned in natural bodybuilding competitions and NCAA is usually a bit stricter. I wouldnt take my chances if I were you, I dont think it would be worth it anyway.

to the gal, try making your own thread on this, odds are you're diet and training will need tweaking as I've yet to see a girl in our gym who lifts in a manner conducive to gaining musculature.


--------------------
"I beat my body and make it my slave." ~1 Corinthians 9:26-27

2006 ONBF Mr. Natural Ohio:
1st place Junior Under 24 division and best poser, 2nd place Novice Under 170 division, 2nd place Men's Open Lightweight



My Progression Video!
My Current BulkFest 200 Journal!!!
My Comprehensive Beginners Guide to Bulking! Read if you're new to this!
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top
Beejis60
Posted: Sep 12 2006, 07:12 PM
Quote Post


Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Member No.: 127472
Joined: 12-September 06



AndrosteneTRIone is a molecule with three ketone linkages. The androsteneDIol is a DI-alcohol (that's two alcohols) and androstenedione is a DI-ketone. Ketones and alcohols have TOTALLY different reactivities in biochemical pathways. Also having two alcohol or ketone sites are not even CLOSELY similar to a molecule with three ketones on it. That's similar to saying acetone (dimethyl ketone OR dimethyl monoketone) is similar to acetic anhydride (dimethyl-diketone-ether). Acetic anhydride different oxidation states, conjugation, resonance forms of carbon whereas acetone really isn't too reactive other than a Claisen Condensation (only possible with a strong base and our bodies are pH=7 which is neutral).
Long story short, having three ketones is chemically not even closely related to two ketones. Two ketones are also different than two alcohols.
If I had pictures of the molecules I would post a link to show the difference or just draw them on ChemDraw but I don't know the actual structures or the IUPAC names.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll